When you add the secondline:
@include('javascript.views.view1')
What did you mean?
Is it a partial view that is within the javascript > views folder structure?
I generally have a section for my page-specific javascript.
Example template.blade.php
<body>
@yield('content')
@include('_partial.scripts')
@yield('page-script')
@include('_partial.footer')
</body>
Example : view-name.blade.php
@section('title', 'My Awesome Page')
@section('content')
My DataTables...
@stop
@section('page-script')
<script type="text/javascript">
// my custom script
</script>
@stop
You could also open & close script tags in template but this setup helps IDE to understand that I am writing JS !
###Improvements ?
I am okay with this setup because it lets me manage the script right in the view where it is used. But, I am unable to do stuffs like minify ... Any ideas ?
I have a default layout (simplified) like this :
...
<div id="main" class="row">
@include('partials.flash')
@yield('content')
</div>
...
@yield('scripts')
My folder structure is as following :
- app/
- views/
- view1.blade.php
- javascript/
- views/
- view1.blade.php
- views/
- views/
@mcraz I used to it this way, but I wanted to separate the javascript related to my views in specific files, not in the view file itself. That's why I'm asking.
Why don't you use an assets folder with a js, css, and img folder within the public folder?
codeATbusiness said:
Why don't you use an assets folder with a js, css, and img folder within the public folder?
I have one to store my css, my images and the functionnal javascript.
The problem is that I need to use Blade in some of my Javascript (basically, to generate AJAX URLs for example).
Sign in to participate in this thread!
Laravel
Laravel News
Laracasts
Laravel Podcast