Support the ongoing development of Laravel.io →
posted 10 years ago
IOC
Last updated 1 year ago.
0

You dont have to have to do that. Just inject the right class in the constructor. In my opinion theres no need to try and abstract any more away, than what you have already done.

use PathToClass\LoginValidator;

class LoginService {

  protected $validator;

  function __construct(LoginValidator $validator){
    $this->validator = $validator;
  }

}
Last updated 1 year ago.
0

Thanks @Herlevsen

That's what I'm doing now.

I'm pretty new to OOP and I'd like to stick to the best practice all the time.

Saw some laravel videos doing this for subclass so I think I should do this too and then stuck at this...

Last updated 1 year ago.
0

Why wouldn't this be best practice? Your Login Service will ALWAYS be validated by the LoginValidator. Even if you some time want to switch to a more advanced (Login)Validator, you can still extend LoginValidator, so that the injection still works.

It doesn't make sense to use an abstract validator, when you know which one it will be.

Last updated 1 year ago.
0

Sign in to participate in this thread!

Eventy

Your banner here too?

wppd wppd Joined 12 Feb 2014

Moderators

We'd like to thank these amazing companies for supporting us

Your logo here?

Laravel.io

The Laravel portal for problem solving, knowledge sharing and community building.

© 2024 Laravel.io - All rights reserved.